info

nix: faith
irl: tom
age: 32
sex: m
mail:

go to

home
archive
writing

who i am

29 yo graduate student in philosophy, currently located in Tampa, FL.

what i do

read, write, drink.

favorite books

Karl Marx, Capital Vol. 1

Robert Brandom, Making it Explicit

Ludwig Wittgenstein, "Philosophical Investigations"

G. F. W. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit

David Foster Wallace, Infinite Jest

Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf

Tom Robbins, Still Life with Woodpecker

Henry David Thoreau, Walden

about this site

This page has been optimized for use with Mozilla Firefox web browser. This site is supported on, and supports, open source software.

this site uses:

Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!

Creative Commons License

eXTReMe Tracker

spambot script

Home » Archives » February 2006 » Marriage, sort of.


[Previous entry: "State of the Union"] [Next entry: "Storm's a-comin'"]

02/01/2006: "Marriage, sort of."

When I was in New York in August, I saw a dear friend, Michaela Walsh. She is a very particular person, as wise as she is honest, smart and especially poltically savvy, but more than anything a true New Yorker: she will say what is on her mind no matter what the consequences. One of the first things she asked me was, "Are you in love?"

Initially shocked by the question, I answered an ambiguous "yes," and moved on. Later in our conversation she brought back up the topic. I told her a bit about Thena, and at the end of my description, she asked what I like about her. I told her, I remember, "She puts up with me." Michaela turned to someone next to her and said something to the effect of "see how much he's learned."

I think about marriage. I think about it as an institution, its history and current applications (not to mention prohibitions!) make me fucking insane. Love is love, law is law; why you would want to make one more like the other is sheer absurdity. (I will come back to that point.)

So, naturally, I'm politically opposed to marriage. But there seems to be this drive, this compulstion within our collective unconsciousness that drives us towards ceremonially or legally endorsing a coupling between two people. Marriage is death, giving up.

The most probable source of this is the Judeo-Christian climate of our America. Marriage is historically a union made in front of God. But for us heathen secular humanists, is marriage really anything then? Is it no different than a contract? A legal agreement not to leave the other person? Do we really need these shackles? Take away God, and marriage just seems trivial.

But, more to the point: as Christie pointed out to me the other day, this urge toward marriage is really just a female thing (you may read "traditional feminine role" here if you're so politically inclined). I've heard countless guys tell me that they got married because either they married, or she would leave. There is this drive for women to nest, and marriage becomes associated with this phenomenon. And it's all or nothing. Nobody likes an ultimatum, and this particular one really has all the charm of Yoko Ono covering an Eagles song. "Hotel California."

But more than that it is absurdity, in the Kirkegaardian sense. It's a genuine leap into the absurd It is a commitment to the other person that I will be with you forever. FOREVER. "For Richer or for Poorer." "In Sickness and Health." "Until Death do we part." There's not a lot of wiggle room here. Taken on that regard, it's kinda scary.

I reflect on marriage, because one of Thena's main contentions in her justification for ending the fun, sordid little thing we had was that I wouldn't marry her. But that wasn't true. I refused to promise when I was unsure that I could provide for her, unsure of what the future would bring. But I intended to. And I used 2 years as a benchmark. I picked that figure since no relationship I have ever had has surpassed 2.5 of your human earth years.

If I could get past two years, I could feel good about saying "forever." For promising. I'm not the kinda guy to make a promise I can't keep. Even Nietzche believed that promises should be kept, despite his general dismantling of the spirit of Judeo-Christian ethics.

But now I wonder if two years is the maximum, not the minimum. After two years you marry or move on. Here's a home version of the game, good luck getting back in touch with all the friends you stopped hanging out with since you were in a serious relationship.

And it's not that I wouldn't marry her. I couldn't. I couldn't promise that I will be able to provide the type of life she deserved. So I tried to work as hard as possible to secure that future. I worked two, thre jobs. Buying her clothes . . . her makeup . . . her food . . . her rent . . . her beer. And, in more eggregious cases, her drugs. Aside from some of her more frivolous spending habits, I was happy to provide. I wanted to give her the type of life she deserved.

But, then I wonder if that isn't the true spirit of marriage; that I was already married in an very specific, more authentic sense, while she could understand marriage as nothing more than the big ceremony . . .a paper . . .a ring . . . cake . . . Uncle Peter drunk. In this sense she refused to marry me. She bailed. She went and shacked up with an ex-aquaintance from the bar (after dating two other friends of mine. Yes, that is one every ten days if you're counting). And in this sense it's not me who can't bear to be alone. It's her.

Yeah, I still hurt. I'm angry. It sucks. I would have had her back a week ago. But I'm fine alone. And although I did not intend to be alone, now I want to be alone. She intended to be alone, and ended up with her toothbrush at someone else's apartment.

And this makes me think about marriage, on this one month anniversary of Thena walking out unexpectantly. And also, about how I was right all along. And so was Michaela.

Replies: 3 comments


on Wednesday, February 1st, Christie said:

Good point(s)! As of 2003, across the board the divorce rate was 63% - no matter how long couples lived together, or never lived together - the length of time they dated, or whether it was a first or second marriage. I think as the years go by, and life expectancy continues to grow, long term relationships will become more obsolete. Reality is break ups are going to hurt regardless, and it’s easier when you don’t have to deal with the legality of a marriage.

I've had the big ceremony with the white dress . . . and I LOVE those pictures of myself! I was such a princess!!! However, now that I have decided I don't want kids, a second time around at the altar doesn't seem as important . . . unless I need health insurance. Hah!

But I'm curious Tom, what about where having children is concerned? Regardless of your preference to have kids or not, does that change your perspective of why a marriage might be important? Of course, there would still be that 63% chance of the child becoming susceptible to experiencing their parents divorcing... but somehow, in my opinion at least, the importance of clarity for a young child, and the sharing of the families last name, still seems like a justifiable reason to get married. As well, family health insurance is much cheaper :-)

I just realized how much I sound like my mother.


on Wednesday, February 1st, faith said:

thought this was topical.


on Thursday, February 2nd, Christie said:

Topical and interesting, yes... but it also makes one wonder how his wife would feel about the article?? Maybe she would feel the same way, or maybe she might come after him with his weedwacker!

all code, images, and content This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License, 2004-10 unless otherwise noted. you may use any part of this site for your own non-commercial use by 1) and acknowledgement and 2) a link to this site wherever it is used.

comrades

Cocktails and Pain: R.I.P.

Chris Donovan dot Com: Chris Donovan has been taking digital arts in new directions, and is an all-around swell dude.

Vague Angel's blog: A bottle of Jack and a thesaurus can go a long way.

downloads

Open Office: I swear by this program, as a (better) substitute for ms office

GIMP: all graphics in this site made with gimp, a substitute for photoshop

Firefox: There's really just no reason to use IE.

news

Slashdot:If you have to ask, you'll never know.

Guerrilla News Network:a cool up and coming radical site

The Economist: A right-of-center British magazine that uniquely takes political economy as seriously as it should.

my idea of fun

The Onion: A must for anyone who is coming to terms with our American social milieu

Piled Higher and Deeper: He feels my pain.

philosophy

Epistemelinks: All things philosophy

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: a good, free research tool

American Philosophical Association: the organization of the industry of philosophy in the US.

politics

Adbusters: because all humor is gallows humor

MoveOn: Anything that pisses off the right-wingers with as much frequency and intensity as this PAC is worth linking.

what I've been listening to